Showing posts with label venting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label venting. Show all posts

Thursday, February 28, 2013

outlook.com calendar subscription...

... is pretty much an outright lie. it doesn't seem to really be a subscription as much as a one-time import. checking the status of my calendar import from google, it says that the latest refresh was at: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 10:08. the time now? Thursday, February 28, 2013 11:24. it's been more than 48 hours, and nothing has been updated. if microsoft wants people to move from gmail to outlook.com, they need to make things work.

that's my rant of the day.

Sunday, February 24, 2008

when a 20 seconds problem takes you 5 hours...

... it's not fun. blargh. new day tomorrow at least.

Tuesday, December 04, 2007

language questions

  • program/programme - when should which one be used?

  • why does everyone refer to persian as "farsi"? wouldn't that be the same as starting to say "svenska" instead of swedish?

    help me!
  • Friday, October 19, 2007

    the day that never happened

    today never happened. there. done. good.

    Friday, October 12, 2007

    peace and climate change?

    I know I shouldn't, but now that al gore and ipcc are awarded the nobel peace prize for 2007, I think there's something strange going on... not so much because environmental changes have nothing to do with peace, because they do (read collapse by jared diamond for more about that), but mostly because human-caused (anthropogenic) global warming is far from certain, and especially not when it comes to al gore's movie an inconvenient truth. here's a report about a high court judge in the uk that ruled that the movie can only be distributed to schools in the country together "only if it was accompanied by new guidlines [sic] to balance the former US vice-president’s “one-sided” views". they found nine inconvenient (pun intended) faults in gore's movie:

    Error one

    Al Gore: A sea-level rise of up to 20 feet would be caused by melting of either West Antarctica or Greenland “in the near future”.

    The judge’s finding: “This is distinctly alarmist and part of Mr. Gore’s “wake-up call”. It was common ground that if Greenland melted it would release this amount of water — “but only after, and over, millennia.”

    Error two

    Gore: Low-lying inhabited Pacific atolls are already “being inundated because of anthropogenic global warming.”

    Judge: There was no evidence of any evacuation having yet happened.

    Error three

    Gore: The documentary described global warming potentially “shutting down the Ocean Conveyor” — the process by which the Gulf Stream is carried over the North Atlantic to western Europe.

    Judge: According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), it was “very unlikely” it would be shut down, though it might slow down.

    Error four

    Gore: He asserted — by ridiculing the opposite view — that two graphs, one plotting a rise in CO2 and the other the rise in temperature over a period of 650,000 years, showed “an exact fit”.

    Judge: Although there was general scientific agreement that there was a connection, “the two graphs do not establish what Mr Gore asserts”.

    Error five

    Gore: The disappearance of snow on Mt Kilimanjaro was expressly attributable to global warming.

    Judge: This “specifically impressed” David Miliband, the Environment Secretary, but the scientific consensus was that it cannot be established that the recession of snows on Mt Kilimanjaro is mainly attributable to human-induced climate change.

    Error six

    Gore: The drying up of Lake Chad was used in the film as a prime example of a catastrophic result of global warming, said the judge.

    Judge: “It is generally accepted that the evidence remains insufficient to establish such an attribution. It is apparently considered to be far more likely to result from other factors, such as population increase and over-grazing, and regional climate variability.”

    Error seven

    Gore: Hurricane Katrina and the consequent devastation in New Orleans to global warming.

    Judge: There is “insufficient evidence to show that”.

    Error eight

    Gore: Referred to a new scientific study showing that, for the first time, polar bears were being found that had actually drowned “swimming long distances — up to 60 miles — to find the ice”.

    Judge: “The only scientific study that either side before me can find is one which indicates that four polar bears have recently been found drowned because of a storm.” That was not to say there might not in future be drowning-related deaths of bears if the trend of regression of pack ice continued — “but it plainly does not support Mr Gore’s description”.

    Error nine

    Gore: Coral reefs all over the world were bleaching because of global warming and other factors.

    Judge: The IPCC had reported that, if temperatures were to rise by 1-3 degrees centigrade, there would be increased coral bleaching and mortality, unless the coral could adapt. But separating the impacts of stresses due to climate change from other stresses, such as over-fishing, and pollution was difficult.


    interesting, huh? there's more about it... three links:
  • Al Gore told there are nine inconvenient truths in his film - the article about the court ruling
  • One Man Challenges the World According to Gore - a blog post commenting it
  • Climate Change Hysteria and Al Gore’s “Chicken Little” Scare Tactics - a long but interesting note about the whole climate change question. read especially the section entitled "Is the Science Certain? Is the Debate Over?" whether there really is global consensus among the scientists or not.


    I'll leave it at that for now.
  • Thursday, September 20, 2007

    licking envelopes

    am I the only one that is horribly bad at it? I always end up taping them just to make sure it doesn't open...

    Wednesday, September 19, 2007

    is this really a poem?

    sl, who are running the public traffic in stockholm (buses, subway, train, etc), have something they call "poetry on the road", and the poems there have always kinda annoyed me. my most recent annoyance is here:

    I collected stamps
    My dad gave me half a kilo
    I didn't collect stamps anymore


    how can that be a poem???

    Tuesday, September 04, 2007

    and eternally cursed be the weather...

    training cancelled because of too much rain. I'm looking forward to global warming.

    Sunday, August 26, 2007

    this is sick

    bulletproofbaby.net just has to be an indication that something is wrong in this world. you have camouflage, armor, gas masks, etc - for babies! sure, nothing wrong with wanting to protect your baby, but isn't it time to work on the other side of it - there's gotta be something crazy when there's a need to protect your baby from these kinds of things!

    and then there's a video of the mother putting her baby in one of the bulletproof strolles, and then shoots with and automatic weapon...

    Tuesday, July 31, 2007

    one time is no time

    two times is worth reacting to
    three times is a problem
    four times is catastrophy.


    that's how many times my computer decided to shut itself down after being on for 5 minutes. yay.

    Thursday, July 12, 2007

    dance movies

    I have now seen three dance movies (bring it on two years ago, honey last week and step up yesterday) that I can remember. one thing they have in common strikes me: the plots leave a lot to wish for.

    while the dance scenes are really cool to watch, it seems as if they have forgotten that there needs to be something more to it. I'm surprised that it is possible to make action movies that have good action and good stories, here they only manage to have great dance moves and sequences, but nothing else.

    honey seemed to only have jessica alba, and step up had absolutely no moments of intensity or a second of excitement. bring it on I don't remember...

    Saturday, July 07, 2007

    I'm in the wrong country

    ... and quite possibly in the wrong decade/century. went out shopping today to see if there were any good shirts to find. (sale in stockholm, as always I suppose...)

    as I said before, I don't wear long-sleeved stuff. and what kind of shirts do they have? 99% long-sleeved. I don't like. and whatever short-sleeved stuff they had were first of all not on sale, and second of all not so nice-looking.

    and the colors are horrible as well. I don't know where the idea came from that purple and pink are nice colors for guys to wear, but they're not. just gotta go somewhere else to find stuff...

    Friday, June 08, 2007

    no, I don't want to know the color of your bra!

    back in stockholm, and the weather is just lovely. ~25 or so degrees, and sunshine. virtually not a cloud in the sky all day, and lots of people outside walking and enjoying their time. naturally, warmer weather means less clothing, and there comes something that I find annoying...

    girls are showing more skin than clothes, more cleavage than face (huge sunglasses are apparently the "in" thing nowadays), and I don't know who finds it nice... they're showing their bras, underwears, and whatnot, and I'd much rather be without seeing any of that. sure, it might be attractive to see some parts of girls, but if any of those were my girlfriend, I'd send them right back into the closet to put on some proper clothing. it *is* possible to look good in the summer while still wearing clothes and looking decent, just seems a lot of people have problems doing that.

    two quotations by Baha'u'llah seem very relevant:

    "Such must be their state that their eyes should behold the evidences of His might, their tongues and hearts make mention of His name, their feet be set towards the lands of His nearness, and their hands take fast hold upon His precepts. And were they to pass through a valley of pure gold and mines of precious silver, they should regard them as wholly unworthy of their attention."

    "Let your eye be chaste, your hand faithful, your tongue truthful and your heart enlightened."

    as for the guys, I'm not interested in seeing what kinda color they have on their boxers either... it's not that hard to pull up a pair of pants or use a belt, is it?

    I'm not saying people should walk around wearing burkas, no need for that, but just dress properly. it's much more appropriate, and sometimes it's what you don't see that's attractive.

    Tuesday, May 15, 2007

    eurovision song contest, part 2

    sweden finished 18th in the eurovision song contest final on saturday, and suddenly everyone in sweden says that it's a scandal and that we no longer should care about the competition. and why? because they realize that everyone is voting for their neighbors. we've known this for more than 10 years, it's so obvious... here are a few examples of countries that vote for each other:
  • the scandinavian countries
  • the baltic countries
  • france/cyprus/malta
  • germany/turkey
  • benelux
  • spain/portugal
  • ex-yugoslavia

  • and that's pretty much how it goes... it's always been like that.

    Friday, May 11, 2007

    eurovision song contest

    the semifinals for the eurovision song contest were yesterday, and it really sickened me. many of the "performances" reminded me of black eyed peas' song my humps, with barely dressed women shaking whatever they had. it was border-line porn. and supposedly, there are some others that are even worse who are in the finals. they are trying to hide their incapability to sing with some distractions.

    of course, not all countries performing had stuff like that, and there were some that were even quite good. although needless to say, it is very much not my style of music.


    in other news, I got my camera yesterday. it looks good, only took two pictures to try it out (deleted them afterwards), but the quality of them seemed really nice. it's not too heavy and sits comfy in my hand. I'm happy with it!



    only one word left to say about it: sexy!